Database Search Result Details
|
First Name
|
JOHN
|
|
Last Name
|
SPRADLING
|
|
Decision Date
|
4/6/1988
|
|
Docket Number
|
BOR2-87-213-1/228-1
|
|
ALJ
|
JW
|
|
Respondent
|
MARSHALL UNIVERSITY
|
|
Employment Type
|
HE
|
|
Job Title
|
GROUNDSKEEPER
|
|
Topics
|
HARASSMENT
|
|
Primary Issues
|
ACTIONS OF SUPERVISORS
|
|
Outcome
|
DENIED
|
|
Statutes
|
18-29-2(n)
|
|
Related Cases
|
|
|
Keywords
|
HARASSMENT; CONTINUOUS
|
|
Intermediate Court of Appeals
|
|
|
Circuit Court
|
|
|
Supreme Court
|
|
|
Synopsis
|
It is clear from the definition of term of harassment that the grievant has to show a continuous practice on the part of the employer and the grievant has failed to establish that the actions of his supervisors constituted even one incident of harassment
|
Back to Results
Search Again