Database Search Result Details
|
First Name
|
MARY
|
|
Last Name
|
AKERS
|
|
Decision Date
|
9/22/1989
|
|
Docket Number
|
89-T-173
|
|
ALJ
|
DC
|
|
Respondent
|
DEPARTMENT OF TAX AND REVENUE
|
|
Employment Type
|
STATE
|
|
Job Title
|
AUDIT CLERK II
|
|
Topics
|
MISCLASSIFICATION
|
|
Primary Issues
|
|
|
Outcome
|
DENIED
|
|
Statutes
|
|
|
Related Cases
|
PAYNE V. ENGY; HAYES V. DHR/CSS
|
|
Keywords
|
|
|
Intermediate Court of Appeals
|
|
|
Circuit Court
|
Grievant appealed to Kanawha County (consolidated with Boggs 89-T-174), Civil Action #89-AA-203, Affirmed 7/25/94, Judge Ranson
|
|
Supreme Court
|
S.Ct. affirmed Cir.Ct. and ALJ at 194 W.VA. 456, 460 S.E.2D 702 (1995).
|
|
Synopsis
|
In a classification-related complaint, a grievant must show that she was performing the duties of one professional categorization, as revealed by the official CSS specifications thereof, while being assigned to another. In essence, this may be accomplished by demonstrating that a position more closely matches one CSS classification description than another. Grievant has not met her burden in this regard.
|
Back to Results
Search Again