Database Search Result Details
|
First Name
|
KAREN/JANICE
|
|
Last Name
|
MCCLURE/LAWRENCE
|
|
Decision Date
|
8/7/1989
|
|
Docket Number
|
89-WCF-208/209
|
|
ALJ
|
DC
|
|
Respondent
|
WORKERS' COMPENSATION FUND
|
|
Employment Type
|
STATE
|
|
Job Title
|
|
|
Topics
|
SELECTION
|
|
Primary Issues
|
Assessment of Applicants
|
|
Outcome
|
DENIED
|
|
Statutes
|
|
|
Related Cases
|
RIFFLE V. HEALTH; PAYNE V. ENGY; SHAVER V. JACKSON BOE
|
|
Keywords
|
|
|
Intermediate Court of Appeals
|
|
|
Circuit Court
|
|
|
Supreme Court
|
|
|
Synopsis
|
Grievants have failed to establish that Respondent's selection of three other applicants for promotion to Analyst was in any way improper. In this regard, they have not shown any flaw in the interview/hiring process so significant that, if it had been eliminated, the outcome reasonably might have been different.
|
Back to Results
Search Again