Database Search Result Details
|
First Name
|
MIKE
|
|
Last Name
|
CROW
|
|
Decision Date
|
6/30/1989
|
|
Docket Number
|
89-CORR-116
|
|
ALJ
|
NK
|
|
Respondent
|
DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS
|
|
Employment Type
|
STATE
|
|
Job Title
|
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER I
|
|
Topics
|
REASSIGNMENT
|
|
Primary Issues
|
|
|
Outcome
|
DENIED
|
|
Statutes
|
29-6A-2
|
|
Related Cases
|
BONNETT V. DOH
|
|
Keywords
|
|
|
Intermediate Court of Appeals
|
|
|
Circuit Court
|
|
|
Supreme Court
|
|
|
Synopsis
|
The Grievant has not demonstrated a violation of department policy or statutory provision governing his employment with respect to management's prerogative to assign correctional officers to specific duties within the prison. The Grievant has failed to prove that he was reassigned to line duty as a result of discrimination or favoritism or that Respondent acted arbitrarily or capriciously when Officer Kirby was retained in the Unified State Shop/Property office assignment.
|
Back to Results
Search Again