Database Search Result Details
|
First Name
|
WILLIAM
|
|
Last Name
|
SMITH
|
|
Decision Date
|
6/29/1988
|
|
Docket Number
|
BOR2-87-229-1
|
|
ALJ
|
JW
|
|
Respondent
|
MARSHALL UNIVERSITY
|
|
Employment Type
|
HE
|
|
Job Title
|
CUSTODIAN
|
|
Topics
|
HARASSMENT
|
|
Primary Issues
|
ORAL REPRIMAND
|
|
Outcome
|
DENIED
|
|
Statutes
|
18-29-1
|
|
Related Cases
|
DUNLEAVY V. KANAWHA, 20-87-102-1
|
|
Keywords
|
REPRIMAND; CONTINUING HARASSMENT
|
|
Intermediate Court of Appeals
|
|
|
Circuit Court
|
|
|
Supreme Court
|
|
|
Synopsis
|
Grievant's request for relief was reduced to a demand that he receive a letter exonerating him of any wrongdoing. Such relief, if granted, would be at best illusory and of little practice effect on the parties and such matters are not properly cognizant in the grievance procedure. Moreover, in the absence of any showing that an oral reprimand is part of a continuing practice of harassment by an employer, the ESEGB will not intrude upon reasonably exercised of school officials in such matters.
|
Back to Results
Search Again