Database Search Result Details
|
First Name
|
CHERYL
|
|
Last Name
|
FARRINGTON
|
|
Decision Date
|
8/29/1989
|
|
Docket Number
|
89-40-322
|
|
ALJ
|
SA
|
|
Respondent
|
PUTNAM COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION
|
|
Employment Type
|
PROF
|
|
Job Title
|
TEACHER
|
|
Topics
|
TIMELINESS
|
|
Primary Issues
|
Timeliness
|
|
Outcome
|
DENIED
|
|
Statutes
|
18-29-4(C)
|
|
Related Cases
|
|
|
Keywords
|
TIMELINESS
|
|
Intermediate Court of Appeals
|
|
|
Circuit Court
|
|
|
Supreme Court
|
|
|
Synopsis
|
GRIEVANT, TEACHER, ALLEGES THAT SHE WAS IMPROPERLY DENIED A PLANNING PERIOD AND REQUIRED TO WORK MORE THAN 7 1/2 HOURS PER DAY, AS REQUIRED BY RESPONDENT'S POLICY, BECAUSE OF BUS DUTY. LEVEL II DECISION AGREED AND ORDERED CESSATION OF BUS DUTY. GRIEVANT APPEALED TO LEVEL III, ALLEGING THAT THE EVALUATOR HAD IMPROPERLY DENIED HER COMPENSATION. BD OF ED., AT LEVEL III, RULED THAT THE APPEAL WAS UNTIMELY. DECISION: DENIED. 'IN THAT GRIEVANT DID NOT CONTEST THE RULING OF UNTIMELY APPEAL TO LEVEL III AND WAIVED HEARING ON THE MATTER AT LEVEL IV AND THE RECORD ESTABLISHES APPEAL TO LEVEL III WAS UNTIMELY, SEE W. VA. CODE 18-29-4(C), THE RULING THAT GRIEVANT UNTIMELY APPEALED TO LEVEL III IS AFFIRMED.' 'THE LEVEL II EVALUATOR DID NOT UNREASONABLY FIND GRIEVANT WAS REQUESTED ALTERNATIVE REMEDIES OF COMPENSATION AND ELIMINATION OF VIOLATIVE BUS DUTIES AND THEREFORE DID NOT ERR IN ORDERING ONLY THE LATTER.'
|
Back to Results
Search Again