Database Search Result Details
|
First Name
|
Mary
|
|
Last Name
|
Stroud
|
|
Decision Date
|
3/11/2016
|
|
Docket Number
|
2016-0015-DVA
|
|
ALJ
|
BTC
|
|
Respondent
|
Department of Veterans Assistance
|
|
Employment Type
|
State
|
|
Job Title
|
LPN
|
|
Topics
|
Verbal Reprimand
|
|
Primary Issues
|
Whether Grievant’s resignation from employment rendered this grievance moot.
|
|
Outcome
|
Moot
|
|
Statutes
|
|
|
Related Cases
|
Brackman v. Div. of Corr./Anthony Corr. Center, Docket No. 02-CORR-104 (Feb. 20, 2003); Gibb v. W. Va. Div. of Corr., Docket No.98-CORR-152 (Sept. 30, 1998); Pritt, et al., v. Dep’t of Health & Human Res., Docket No. 2008-0812-CONS (May 30,2008); Wilkins v. Dep’t of Envtl. Prot., Docket No. 2011-1793-DEP (Aug. 22, 2013).
|
|
Keywords
|
Verbal reprimand; resignation; moot; Motion to Dismiss; relief
|
|
Intermediate Court of Appeals
|
|
|
Circuit Court
|
|
|
Supreme Court
|
|
|
Synopsis
|
Grievant grieved both conditions of her employment and a verbal reprimand. Grievant has now resigned from employment. Respondent moved to dismiss asserting mootness. A Grievant is no longer an employee, and a decision on her grievance would have no practical effect, the grievance is moot. Accordingly, Respondent’s motion to dismiss should be granted, and this grievance, DISMISSED.
|
Back to Results
Search Again