Database Search Result Details
|
First Name
|
David
|
|
Last Name
|
Parsons
|
|
Decision Date
|
5/10/2017
|
|
Docket Number
|
2016-1812-DOA
|
|
ALJ
|
BTC
|
|
Respondent
|
General Services Division and Division of Personnel
|
|
Employment Type
|
STATE
|
|
Job Title
|
Operations and Maintenance Manager
|
|
Topics
|
Pay Increase
|
|
Primary Issues
|
Whether Grievant proved the Division of Personnel erred in determining the amount of pay increase warranted by his certification.
|
|
Outcome
|
Denied
|
|
Statutes
|
|
|
Related Cases
|
Dyer v. Lincoln County Bd. of Educ., Docket No. 95-22-494 (June 28, 1996); Crockett v. Andrews, 153 W. Va. 714, 172 S.E.2d 384 (1970); Governor’s Office to act within a certain timeframe on a request for a discretionary pay increase.” Hapney v. Pub. Emp. Ins. Agency, Dep’t of Admin., & Div. of Pers., Docket No. 2013-0861-DOA (Feb. 24, 2014); Green v. Dep’t of Health & Human Res. and Div. of Pers., Docket No. 2011-1577-DHHR (Oct. 1, 2012); Boggess v. Pub. Serv. Comm’n, Docket No. 2015-0079-PSC (Mar. 25, 2015)
|
|
Keywords
|
Discretionary Pay Increase; Policy; Certification
|
|
Intermediate Court of Appeals
|
|
|
Circuit Court
|
|
|
Supreme Court
|
|
|
Synopsis
|
Grievant is employed by the General Services Division as the Building Operations Maintenance Manager. Grievant protested the amount of discretionary pay increase he received for completion of a certification and sought the pay increase retroactive to his receipt of the certification. Grievant failed to prove the Division of Personnel erred in determining the amount of pay increase warranted by his certification. Grievant asserted no law, rule, or policy that required Respondent General Services Division or Respondent Division of Personnel to act on the discretionary pay increase within a certain timeframe, therefore, Grievant is not entitled to a retroactive award of his pay increase. Accordingly, the grievance is denied.
|
Back to Results
Search Again