Database Search Result Details

First Name Tarayn
Last Name Sears, et al.
Decision Date 8/11/2017
Docket Number 2017-0503-CONS
ALJ RLR
Respondent Division of Motor Vehicles
Employment Type STATE
Job Title Lead CSR
Topics Dismissed; Dress Code Policy
Primary Issues Whether this grievance is moot.
Outcome Dismissed; Moot
Statutes
Related Cases Muncy v. Mingo County Bd. of Educ., Docket No. 96-29-211 (Mar. 28, 1997); Dooley v. Dep’t of Transp., Docket No. 94-DOH-255 (Nov. 30, 1994); Pascoli & Kriner v. Ohio County Bd. of Educ., Docket No. 91-35-229/239 (Nov. 27, 1991)
Keywords Dress Code Policy; Covering Tattoos; Motion to Dismiss; Relief; Moot
Intermediate Court of Appeals
Circuit Court
Supreme Court
Synopsis The issue of the requirement that Grievants conceal their tattoos at all times regardless if they do not work with the public is moot. Some Grievants are no longer employed with Respondent, and Respondent revised the policy to eliminate this requirement. Accordingly, this grievance is dismissed.

Back to Results Search Again