Database Search Result Details
|
First Name
|
Jack
|
|
Last Name
|
Jarrells
|
|
Decision Date
|
9/29/2017
|
|
Docket Number
|
2017-2163-DOT
|
|
ALJ
|
RLR
|
|
Respondent
|
Division of Highways
|
|
Employment Type
|
STATE
|
|
Job Title
|
Transportation Worker 2
|
|
Topics
|
Dismissed
|
|
Primary Issues
|
Whether this grievance presents a claim upon which relief can be granted.
|
|
Outcome
|
Dismissed; Remedy Wholly Unavailable
|
|
Statutes
|
156 C.S.R. 1 § 156-1-6 6.11(2008); W. Va. Code § 6C-2-2(i); 156 C.S.R. 1 § 156-1-3 (2008); W. Va. Code § 18-29-3(h)
|
|
Related Cases
|
Dooley v. Dep’t of Transp., Docket No. 94-DOH-255 (Nov. 30, 1994); Pascoli & Kriner v. Ohio County Bd. of Educ., Docket No. 91-35-229/239 (Nov. 27, 1991); Skaff v. Pridemore, 200 W. Va. 700, 490 S.E.2d 787 (1997); Stewart v. Div. of Corr., Docket No. 04-CORR-430 (May 31, 2005); Jarrell v. Raleigh County Bd. of Educ., Docket No. 95-41-479 (July 8, 1996); White v. Monongalia County Bd. of Educ., Docket No. 93-30-371 (Mar. 30, 1994); Daugherty v. Bd. of Directors, Docket No. 93-BOD-295 (Apr. 27, 1994); Grant & Grant v. Cabell County Bd. of Educ., Docket No. 06-06-012 (Oct. 17, 2006)
|
|
Keywords
|
Motion to Dismiss; Relief; Remedy Wholly Unavailable
|
|
Intermediate Court of Appeals
|
|
|
Circuit Court
|
|
|
Supreme Court
|
|
|
Synopsis
|
Grievant seeks disciplinary action against other employees. It is well settled that the relief sought by Grievant is not within the authority of the undersigned to grant. Respondent has demonstrated that the relief requested cannot be granted based on the applicable law. Therefore, the grievance is dismissed.
|
Back to Results
Search Again