Database Search Result Details
|
First Name
|
Kayla
|
|
Last Name
|
Hawley
|
|
Decision Date
|
10/31/2017
|
|
Docket Number
|
2017-0211-WVU
|
|
ALJ
|
BLG
|
|
Respondent
|
West Virginia University
|
|
Employment Type
|
HE
|
|
Job Title
|
Campus Service Worker
|
|
Topics
|
Classification
|
|
Primary Issues
|
Whether Grievant demonstrated that her PIQ was not accurate.
|
|
Outcome
|
Denied
|
|
Statutes
|
|
|
Related Cases
|
Elkins v. Southern W. Va. Community Coll., Docket No. 90-BOD-124 (Mar. 4, 1991); Kyle v. W. Va. State Bd. of Rehab., Div. of Rehab. Ser., Docket No. VR-88-006 (Mar. 28, 1989); Tennant v. Marion Health Care Found., 194 W. Va. 97, 459 S.E.2d 374 (1995); Watts v. Dep’t of Health & Human Res., 195 W. Va. 430, 465 S.E.2d 887 (1995); Jessen, et al., v. Bd. of Trustees, Docket No. 94-MBOT-1059 (Oct. 26, 1995)
|
|
Keywords
|
Classification; Job Duties; Relief; PIQ
|
|
Intermediate Court of Appeals
|
|
|
Circuit Court
|
|
|
Supreme Court
|
|
|
Synopsis
|
Grievant alleged that her PIQ at the time she filed her grievance was not accurate, as she believed she had been performing maintenance duties rather than custodial duties more than 30% of the time. Rather than asserting that she was misclassified and asking for relief that her position be placed in a particular classification, the relief sought by Grievant is that a new PIQ be prepared which is accurate for the period at issue. At the time of the level three hearing, Grievant had a new supervisor who had removed some of the maintenance duties from Grievant’s duties. Grievant’s supervisor prepared a new PIQ for Grievant’s position after this grievance was filed, which Grievant signed without reviewing, and WVU Human Resources personnel conducted a desk audit and concluded Grievant was properly classified.
|
Back to Results
Search Again