Database Search Result Details
|
First Name
|
Brittany
|
|
Last Name
|
Aldrich, et al.
|
|
Decision Date
|
4/23/2018
|
|
Docket Number
|
2017-0884-CONS
|
|
ALJ
|
BLG
|
|
Respondent
|
West Virginia University
|
|
Employment Type
|
HE
|
|
Job Title
|
Various
|
|
Topics
|
Pay
|
|
Primary Issues
|
Whether Grievants demonstrated that they are entitled to a salary increase.
|
|
Outcome
|
Denied
|
|
Statutes
|
W. Va. Code § 18B-9-4; 133 C.S.R. 8, §19.4
|
|
Related Cases
|
Jones, et al., v. W. Va. Univ., Docket No. 2016-0225-CONS (Oct. 18, 2017); Nafe v. W. Va. Dep’t of Health & Human Res., Docket No. 96-HHR-386 (Mar. 26, 1997); Brutto v. W. Va. Dep’t of Health & Human Res., Docket No. 96-HHR-076 (July 24, 1996); Salmons v. W. Va. Dep’t of Transp., Docket No. 94-DOH-555 (Mar. 20, 1995); Hickman v. W. Va. Dep’t of Transp., Docket No. 94-DOH-435 (Feb. 28, 1995); Skaff v. Pridemore, 200 W. Va. 700, 490 S.E.2d 787 (1997)
|
|
Keywords
|
Pay Increase; Classification; Pay Grade; Starting Pay; Pay Range
|
|
Intermediate Court of Appeals
|
|
|
Circuit Court
|
|
|
Supreme Court
|
|
|
Synopsis
|
Grievants believe they are being treated unfairly and should be awarded a pay increase because some new employees are receiving a starting wage above entry level for the pay grade, and some new hires are being paid more than Grievants, yet Grievants are expected to offer guidance to these new employees. Grievants did not demonstrate that Respondent has violated any law, rule, regulation, policy, or procedure. Moreover, Respondent is not required to compensate all employees at the same level. All that is required is that the employees be properly classified and be paid within the pay range for the classification’s pay grade.
|
Back to Results
Search Again