Database Search Result Details

First Name Paula
Last Name Cunningham
Decision Date 5/1/2018
Docket Number 2017-2002-DOT
ALJ SLB
Respondent Division of Motor Vehicles
Employment Type STATE
Job Title Customer Service Representative
Topics Selection
Primary Issues Whether Grievant demonstrated that there was a significant flaw in the selection process.
Outcome Denied
Statutes W. Va. Code § 6C-2-2(d)
Related Cases Unrue v. W.Va. Div. of Highways, Docket No. 95-DOH-287 (Jan. 22, 1996); Thibault v. Div. of Rehabilitation Serv., Docket No. 93-RS-489 (July 29, 1994); Hopkins v. Monroe County Bd. of Educ., Docket No. 95-31-477 (Fed. 21, 1996); Blake v. Kanawha County Bd. of Educ., Docket No. 01-20-470 (Oct. 29, 2001); Pullen v. Dep’t of Transp., Docket No. 06-DOH-121 (Aug. 2, 2006)
Keywords Selection; Most Qualified Candidate; Managerial Experience; Interview Process; Interview Questionnaire; Discrimination; Arbitrary or Capricious
Intermediate Court of Appeals
Circuit Court
Supreme Court
Synopsis Grievant is a Customer Service Representative in the DMV. She timely applied for the Transportation Services Manager I (“TSM I”) position in the Department of Motor Vehicles (“DMV”). Grievant alleges that the selection process was significantly flawed, so as to affect the outcome of the selection process, that she was more qualified than the candidate selected, and that Respondent discriminated against her in the hiring process. Respondent maintains that it legitimately considered personality traits, as well as the length of managerial experience of the candidates, both of which reasonably qualified the other individual over Grievant for a managerial position. Grievant failed to prove any violations, unlawful conduct, or discrimination by Respondent and, likewise, failed to demonstrate that Respondent’s selection was arbitrary or capricious.

Back to Results Search Again