Database Search Result Details

First Name Jamil
Last Name Chaudri
Decision Date 6/15/2018
Docket Number 2017-1220-MU
ALJ LRB
Respondent Marshall University
Employment Type HE
Job Title Professor
Topics Graduate Faculty Membership Status
Primary Issues Whether Respondent unlawfully denied Grievant Graduate Faculty status.
Outcome Denied
Statutes W. Va. Code § 6C-2-2(d)
Related Cases Karle v. Bd. Of Trustees/Marshall Univ., Docket No. 98-BOT-258 (Apr. 19, 1999); Nelson v. Bd. of Trustees/W. Va. Univ., Docket No. 99-BOT-514 (June 22, 2001); Baker v. Bd. of Trustees, Docket No. 97-BOT-359 (Apr. 30, 1998); Hart v. Bd. of Directors, Docket No. 95-BOD-198 (Mar. 6, 1996)
Keywords Graduate Faculty Membership Status; Policy; Requirements; Favoritism; Arbitrary and Capricious
Intermediate Court of Appeals
Circuit Court
Supreme Court
Synopsis Grievant is employed as a full professor with tenure at Marshall University. Grievant contends that Respondent illicitly denied him “Graduate Faculty” status. Grievant averts that Respondent’s agent(s) inequitable applied determining factors to access his application and qualifications. Grievant alleges discriminatory analysis of his accomplishments coupled with an arbitrary and capricious assessment process. Respondent maintains they followed appropriate policy and criteria in review of Grievant’s application. Respondent maintains, despite providing Grievant ample opportunity to document prerequisites, Grievant’s application was denied due to lack of evidence of continuing scholarly or creative activity over the five-year period immediately preceding his application, as required by relevant policy. Grievant did not established Respondent violated germane procedure, policy, or law. Grievant did not persuasively convey the non-renewal (denial) of his Graduate Faculty Membership Status is arbitrary and capricious, or discriminatory. Grievant did not achieve the burden of proof. This Grievance is denied.

Back to Results Search Again