Database Search Result Details
First Name
|
Elizabeth
|
Last Name
|
Loy
|
Decision Date
|
7/19/2018
|
Docket Number
|
2018-1206-CONS
|
ALJ
|
BTC
|
Respondent
|
Board of Education
|
Employment Type
|
DOE
|
Job Title
|
Director
|
Topics
|
Dismissed; Suspension; Termination; Dismissal
|
Primary Issues
|
Whether Grievant stated a claim on which relief can be granted.
|
Outcome
|
Dismissed; Failure to State a Claim
|
Statutes
|
W. Va. Code St. R. § 156-1-6.19; W. Va. Code St. R. § 156-1-6.11; W. Va. Code § 18-2-26(c)
|
Related Cases
|
Armstrong v. W. Va. Div. of Culture & History, 229 W. Va. 538, 544, 729 S.E.2d 860, 866 (2012); Waite v. Civil Serv. Comm'n,, 161 W.Va. 154, 241 S.E.2d 164 (1977); Major v. DeFrench, 169 W.Va. 241, 286 S.E.2d 688, 695 (1982); Orteza v. Monongalia Cty. Gen. Hosp., 173 W. Va. 461, 463, 318 S.E.2d 40, 42 (1984); W. Va. Bd. of Educ. v. Marple, 236 W. Va. 654, 783 S.E.2d 75 (2015); Wright v. Standard Ultramarine & Color Co., 141 W. Va. 368, 382, 90 S.E.2d 459, 468 (1955); Wilhelm v. W. Va. Lottery, 198 W.Va. 92, 479 S.E.2d 602 (1996); Armstrong v. W. Va. Div. of Culture & History, 229 W. Va. 538, 729 S.E.2d 860 (2012)
|
Keywords
|
Suspension; Termination; Motion to Dismiss; Substantial Public Policy; Relief; At-Will
|
Intermediate Court of Appeals
|
|
Circuit Court
|
|
Supreme Court
|
|
Synopsis
|
Grievant was employed by Respondent, Board of Education, as Director of the West Virginia Birth to Three Program at the Regional Education Service Agencies Eight. Grievant’s employment was at-will. Grievant was suspended with pay due to allegations that she had harassed employees and created a hostile work environment. Respondent later dismissed Grievant from employment without stating any cause for terminating her at-will employment. Grievant failed to state a claim on which relief can be granted because she did not allege that her discharge contravened some substantial public policy. Accordingly, the grievance is dismissed.
|
Back to Results
Search Again