Database Search Result Details

First Name Talal
Last Name Fathallah
Decision Date 4/30/2019
Docket Number 2018-0433-DEP
ALJ WBM
Respondent Department of Environmental Protection/Division of Water and Waste Management
Employment Type STATE
Job Title Technical Analyst
Topics Selection
Primary Issues Whether Grievant that the selection of the most qualified candidate was arbitrary or capricious.
Outcome Denied
Statutes W. Va. Code § 6C 2 2 (d)
Related Cases Thibault v. Div. of Rehabilitation Serv., Docket No. 93-RS-489 (July 29, 1994); Mihaliak v. Div. of Rehab. Serv., Docket No. 98-RS-126 (Aug. 3, 1998); Baker v. Bd. of Trustees/W. Va. Univ. at Parkersburg, Docket No. 97-BOT-359 (Apr. 30, 1998); Harrison v. W. Va. Bd. of Directors/Bluefield State College, Docket No. 93-BOD-400 (Apr. 11, 1995); Frymier v. Higher Education Policy Comm’n, 655 S.E.2d 52, 221 W. Va. 306 (2007); Harris v. Dep’t of Transp., Docket No. 2008 1594 DOT (Dec. 15, 2008)
Keywords Selection; Discrimination; Qualifications; Arbitrary and Capricious
Intermediate Court of Appeals
Circuit Court
Supreme Court
Synopsis Grievant applied for a Position in the Environmental Resources Program Manager 2 classification in the DWWM Program Support subdivision. Grievant is a valued employee and met the minimum qualifications for the position. Respondent picked a different applicant for the position. Grievant claims that he was the most qualified candidate and Respondent’s selection decision was improper. Grievant also claims that he was subjected to discrimination and favoritism. Respondent demonstrated that the standard hiring procedure was followed reasonably explained the committee’s recommendation and selection of a different applicant. Grievant did not prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the actions of Respondent were unlawful or arbitrary and capricious. Grievant did not prove that he was treated any differently than other employees in the hiring process for this position.

Back to Results Search Again