Database Search Result Details
    
        
            | 
                First Name
             | 
            
                Samantha
             | 
        
        
            | 
                Last Name
             | 
            
                Ashby
             | 
        
        
            | 
                Decision Date
             | 
            
                9/4/2019
             | 
        
        
        
            | 
                Docket Number
             | 
            
                2019-0737-PSCWVU
                
             | 
        
        
            | 
                ALJ
             | 
            
                BTC
             | 
        
        
            | 
                Respondent
             | 
            
                West Virginia University Potomac State College/ AND 
             | 
        
        
            | 
                Employment Type
             | 
            
                HE
             | 
        
        
            | 
                Job Title
             | 
            
                Administrative Associate
             | 
        
        
            | 
                Topics
             | 
            
                Dismissed
             | 
        
        
            | 
                Primary Issues
             | 
            
                Whether Respondent proved the grievance is now moot as Grievant is no longer an employee.
             | 
        
        
            | 
                Outcome
             | 
            
                Moot
             | 
        
        
            | 
                Statutes
             | 
            
                W. Va. Code St. R. § 156-1-3; W. Va. Code § 6C-2-1(a)
             | 
        
        
            | 
                Related Cases
             | 
            
                Schade v. W. Va. Univ., No. 18-0512 (W. Va. Supreme Court, June 7, 2019); Bragg v. Dep’t of Health & Human Res., Docket No. 03-HHR-348 (May 28, 2004); Burkhammer v. Dep’t of Health & Human Res., Docket No. 03-HHR-073 (May 30, 2003); Pridemore v. Dep’t of Health & Human Res., Docket No. 95-HHR-561 (Sept. 30, 1996); Dooley v. Dep’t of Transp., Docket No. 94-DOH-255 (Nov. 30, 1994); Pascoli & Kriner v. Ohio County Bd. of Educ., Docket No. 91-35-229/239 (Nov. 27, 1991).” Priest v. Kanawha County Bd. of Educ., Docket No. 00-20-144 (Aug. 15, 2000); Miraglia v. Ohio County Bd. of Educ., Docket No. 92-35-270 (Feb. 19, 1993); Stalnaker v. Div. of Corr., Docket No. 2013-1084-MAPS (Mar. 26, 2014); Dunlap v. Dep't of Environmental Protection, Docket No. 2008-0808-DEP (Mar. 20, 2009); Vest v. Bd. of Educ., 193 W. Va. 222, 225, 455 S.E.2d 781, 784 (1995)
             | 
        
        
            | 
                Keywords
             | 
            
                Motion to Dismiss; Employee; Remedy; Moot
             | 
        
        
            | 
                Intermediate Court of Appeals
             | 
            
                
             | 
        
        
            | 
                Circuit Court
             | 
            
                
             | 
        
        
            | 
                Supreme Court
             | 
            
                
             | 
        
        
            | 
                Synopsis
             | 
            
                Grievant filed this grievance protesting a written warning and the extension of her probationary period and alleging harassment/hostile work environment.  Respondent moved to dismiss the grievance asserting mootness as Grievant had resigned from employment.  Relief for the allegation of harassment/hostile work environment is unavailable as the Grievance Board has no authority to award tort-like damages.  Relief for the written warning is moot as Grievant suffered no loss of pay.  Accordingly, Respondent’s motion to dismiss should be granted, and this grievance, dismissed.
             | 
        
    
 
    Back to Results
    Search Again