Database Search Result Details

First Name Kim
Last Name Smith
Decision Date 12/5/2019
Docket Number 2019-0696-DEP
ALJ LRB
Respondent Department of Environmental Protection/Central Office - DEP AND Division of Personnel
Employment Type STATE
Job Title ERS II
Topics Classification
Primary Issues Whether Grievant proved that DOP acted in an arbitrary or capricious manner as relates to the classification determination of the position in discussion.
Outcome Denied
Statutes W. Va. Code R. §143-1-3.72; W. Va. Code § 29-6-1
Related Cases Hayes v. W.Va. Dep’t of Natural Resources, Docket No. NR-88-038 (Mar. 28, 1989); Captain v. W. Va. Div. of Health, Docket No. 90-H-471 (Apr. 4, 1991); Dollison v. W. Va. Dep't of Employment Security, Docket No. 89-ES-101 (Nov. 3, 1989); Broaddus v. W. Va. Div. of Human Serv., Docket Nos. 89-DHS-606, 607, 609 (Aug. 31, 1990); Bonnett v. West Virginia Dep’t of Tax and Revenue and Div. of Personnel, Docket No. 99-T&R-118 (Aug 30, 1999), Aff’d Kan. Co. C. Ct. Docket No. 99-AA-151 (Mar. 1, 2001); Stihler v. Div. of Natural Res., Docket No. 07-DNR-360D (Feb. 6, 2009); Keys v. Dep’t of Environmental Protection, Docket No. 06-DEP-307 (April 20, 2007); Prue v. Division of Corrections and Division of Personnel, Docket No. 2017-1400-MAPS (Nov. 3, 2017); Moore v. W. Va. Dep’t of Health & Human Resources, Docket No. 94-HHR-126 (Aug. 26, 1994); Celestine v. State Police, Docket No. 2009-0256-MAPS (May 4, 2009)
Keywords Classification; Classification/Compensation Plan; Job Duties; Arbitrary or Capricious
Intermediate Court of Appeals
Circuit Court Grievant appealed to Kanawha County Circuit Court 1/6/2020; Judge Bloom; Civil Action No. 20-AA-4; Final Order 7/15/2020; Affirmed
Supreme Court
Synopsis Grievant is employed by Respondent DEP in a position classified as an Environmental Resources Specialist 2. Grievant believes the position she occupies should be classified as an Environmental Resources Specialist 3. The Division of Personnel is the entity of WV State government charged with making classification determinations. DOP develops and manages the State’s Classification/Compensation Plan. Upon reviewing the documents related to Grievant’s position, and performing an on-site audit, DOP determined that the position occupied by Grievant is not assigned complex scientific work at the advanced level within the ERS class series and does not have recognized lead worker responsibilities, both of which are fundamental requirements of the ERS 3 classification. Grievant failed to prove she was engaged in recognized duties at the advanced level within the ERS class series. Grievant failed to prove DOP’s determination that the position should not be allocated to the ERS 3 classification was arbitrary, capricious or clearly wrong. This grievance is DENIED.

Back to Results Search Again