Database Search Result Details
|
First Name
|
Alfred
|
|
Last Name
|
Kasprowicz
|
|
Decision Date
|
12/8/2020
|
|
Docket Number
|
2020-0368-CONS
|
|
ALJ
|
RLR
|
|
Respondent
|
West Virginia University
|
|
Employment Type
|
HE
|
|
Job Title
|
Director
|
|
Topics
|
Contract
|
|
Primary Issues
|
Whether Grievant met his burden of proof to show any entitlement or right to have his contract renewed.
|
|
Outcome
|
Denied
|
|
Statutes
|
|
|
Related Cases
|
P.E. v. Marshall Univ., Docket No. 06-HE-216 (Mar. 5, 2008); Siu v. Johnson, 784 F.2d 238 (4th Cir. 1984); Smith v. Univ. of N. Carolina, 632 F.2d 316 (4th Cir. 1980); Gruen v. Bd. of Directors, Docket No. 95-BOD-281 (Mar. 6, 1997); Gomez-Avila v. W. Va. Bd. of Trustees, Docket No. 94-BOT-524 (Mar. 14, 1995); Brackman v. Div. of Corr./Anthony Corr. Center, Docket No, 02-CORR-104 ( Feb. 20, 2003); Spence v. Div. of Natural Res., Docket No. 2010-0149-CONS (Oct. 29, 2009)
|
|
Keywords
|
Annual Contract; Renewal
|
|
Intermediate Court of Appeals
|
|
|
Circuit Court
|
|
|
Supreme Court
|
|
|
Synopsis
|
Grievant asserts that he was entitled to an extension of his employment as the Director of the Carruth Center for Psychological and Psychiatric Services at West Virginia University. Grievant was employed pursuant to an annual contract. Respondent asserts that Grievant had no right nor entitlement to a new annual contract and Respondent had no duty or responsibility to renew Grievant’s annual contract. Grievant was unable to produce any evidence of any right or expectation of continued employment. Grievant did not meet his burden of proof to show any entitlement or right to have his contract renewed. In addition, the remedies requested by Grievant are beyond the authority of the Grievance Board to provide. This grievance is denied.
|
Back to Results
Search Again