Database Search Result Details
|
First Name
|
Daniel
|
|
Last Name
|
Price
|
|
Decision Date
|
8/4/2023
|
|
Docket Number
|
2023-0485-JefED
|
|
ALJ
|
RLR
|
|
Respondent
|
Jefferson County Board of Education
|
|
Employment Type
|
PROF
|
|
Job Title
|
Classroom Teacher
|
|
Topics
|
Dismissal, Moot
|
|
Primary Issues
|
Whether the greivance is moot when the employee who was alleged to have created a hostile work environment is not longer employed at the same work location as Grievant.
|
|
Outcome
|
Dismissed
|
|
Statutes
|
|
|
Related Cases
|
Bragg v. Dept. of Health & Human Res., Docket No. 03-HHR-348 (May 28, 2004); Burkhammer v. Dep't of Health & Human Res., Docket No. 03-HHR-073 (May 30, 2003); Pridemore v. Dep't of Health & Human Res., Docket No. 95-HHR-561 (Sept. 30, 1996); Dooley v. Dep’t of Transp., Docket No. 94-DOH-255 (Nov. 30, 1994); Pascoli & Kriner v. Ohio County Bd. of Educ., Docket No. 91-35-229/239 (Nov. 27, 1991).’ Priest v. Kanawha County Bd. of Educ., Docket No. 00-20-144 (Aug. 15, 2000).” Smith v. Lewis County Bd. of Educ., Docket No. 02-21-028 (June 21, 2002).
|
|
Keywords
|
Dismissed, Moot, Hostile Work Environment
|
|
Intermediate Court of Appeals
|
|
|
Circuit Court
|
|
|
Supreme Court
|
|
|
Synopsis
|
Grievant, Daniel Shane Price, is employed by Respondent, Jefferson County Board of Education, as a teacher. The primary allegation in this grievance is a hostile work environment due to the actions and behavior of a co-worker at the school. Respondent took specific steps in November of 2022 to limit any possible contact or interaction between the Grievant and the co-worker for the remainder of the semester. The undersigned, in a hostile work environment grievance, would only be authorized to direct the Respondent to address the behavior and to take measures to assure it longer occurs. That issue is now moot, and relief is not possible in this case. Accordingly, this grievance is dismissed.
|
Back to Results
Search Again