Database Search Result Details
|
First Name
|
MARY/ELIZABETH
|
|
Last Name
|
VANDEVANDER/PUGH
|
|
Decision Date
|
4/29/1988
|
|
Docket Number
|
15-88-002-3
|
|
ALJ
|
NK
|
|
Respondent
|
HANCOCK COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION
|
|
Employment Type
|
PROF
|
|
Job Title
|
TEACHERS (ELEMENTARY)
|
|
Topics
|
PLANNING PERIOD
|
|
Primary Issues
|
Validity of a written agreement allowing an exchange of planning period time for compensation when a substitute is not available.
|
|
Outcome
|
DENIED
|
|
Statutes
|
18A-4-14
|
|
Related Cases
|
LUDFORD V. PLEASANTS COUNTY
|
|
Keywords
|
PLANNING PERIOD; PAY; EXCHANGE; COMPENSATION; AGREEMENT; ADVOCACY;
|
|
Intermediate Court of Appeals
|
|
|
Circuit Court
|
|
|
Supreme Court
|
|
|
Synopsis
|
Grievant's object to a written agreement between their teacher advocacy group and school administrators which establishes separate criteria for both elementary and secondary teachers to waive a planning period to substitute for an absent teacher. Grievance Denied: whether a written agreement entered into between a teacher's advocacy group and school administrators which provides an opportunity for a temporary assignment and salary enhancement for two separate groups of teachers should be abolished is not the proper subject for an adjudication the West Virginia ESEGB as long as the agreement is not violative of school law.
|
Back to Results
Search Again