Related Cases
|
Lewis v. Kanawha County Bd. of Educ., Docket No. 97-20-554 (May 27, 1998); Lowry v. W. Va. Dep’t of Educ., Docket No. 96-DOE-130 (Dec. 26, 1996); Hale v. Mingo County Bd. of Educ., Docket No. 95-29-315 (Jan. 25, 1996); Payne v. Mason County Bd. of Educ., Docket No. 96-26-047 (Nov. 27, 1996); Trickett v. Preston County Bd. of Educ., Docket No. 95-39-413 (May 8, 1996); Leichliter v. W. Va. Dep't of Health & Human Res., Docket No. 92-HHR-486 (May 17, 1993); McDaniel v. W. Va. Div. of Labor, 214 W. Va. 719, 591 S.E.2d 277 (2003); Mountaineer Disposal Service, Inc. v. Dyer, 156 W. Va. 766, 197 S.E.2d 111 (1973); Wilson v. Dep’t of Health & Human Res., Docket No. 2011-1769-DHHR (Oct. 31, 2011); Dooley, et al., v. Dep’t of Transp., Docket No. 94-DOH-255 (Nov. 30, 1994); Pascoli & Kriner v. Ohio County Bd. of Educ., Docket No. 91-35-229/239 (Nov. 27, 1991). Priest v. Kanawha County Bd. of Educ., Docket No. 00-20-144 (Aug. 15, 2000); Smith v. Lewis County Bd. of Educ., Docket No. 02-21-028 (June 21, 2002)
|
Synopsis
|
Grievant was not an employee of Respondent at the time he filed this grievance. As such, Grievant lacks standing to pursue a grievance against Respondent. Further, to the extent that Grievant is seeking an order from the Grievance Board compelling Respondent, PEIA, or the Consolidated Public Retirement Board to allow him to use his accrued sick leave to pay his insurance premium, such relief is wholly unavailable through the grievance procedure. Accordingly, this grievance is dismissed.
|