Database Search Result Details
|
First Name
|
Marcia
|
|
Last Name
|
Booker
|
|
Decision Date
|
12/8/2022
|
|
Docket Number
|
2022-0701-DOA
|
|
ALJ
|
CHL
|
|
Respondent
|
Public Employees Insurance Agency
|
|
Employment Type
|
STATE
|
|
Job Title
|
CSR - II
|
|
Topics
|
Discrimination
|
|
Primary Issues
|
Whether Grievant proved her claims of discrimination by a preponderance of the evidence.
|
|
Outcome
|
Denied
|
|
Statutes
|
W. Va. Code St. R. § 156-1-3 (2018); W. Va. Code § 6C-2-2(d)
|
|
Related Cases
|
Leichliter v. Dep't of Health & Human Res., Docket No. 92-HHR-486 (May 17, 1993), aff’d, Pleasants Cnty. Cir. Ct. Civil Action No. 93-APC-1 (Dec. 2, 1994); Frymier v. Higher Education Policy Comm., 655 S.E.2d 52, 221 W. Va. 306 (2007); Harris v. Dep’t of Transp., Docket No. 2008-1594-DOT (Dec. 15, 2008); Vest v. Board of Educ., 193 W. Va. 222, 225, 455 S.E.2d 781,784 (1995); Baker v. Bd. of Trs./W. Va. Univ. at Parkersburg, Docket No. 97-BOT-359 (Apr. 30, 1998); Harrison v. W. Va. Bd. of Drs./Bluefield State Coll., Docket No. 93-BOD-400 (Apr. 11, 1995)
|
|
Keywords
|
Discrimination; Technological; Computer; Resolution; Performance; OT; Persistent; Error; Evaluation; EPA
|
|
Intermediate Court of Appeals
|
|
|
Circuit Court
|
|
|
Supreme Court
|
|
|
Synopsis
|
Grievant is employed by Respondent as a Customer Service Representative II. Grievant asserts that Respondent has discriminated against her by causing her to experience persistent technological problems that hamper her ability to perform her job duties, and by failing to correct those problems. Respondent denies all of Grievant’s claims and asserts that it has taken all reasonable steps to resolve the technological problems that Grievant is experiencing. Grievant failed to prove her claims by a preponderance of the evidence. Therefore, the grievance is DENIED.
|
Back to Results
Search Again